As humble graphic designers our work is instantly disposable. Not so with architects. Their work is around for us all to love or hate for a very long time indeed.
In recent years many so call ‘iconic’ structures have appeared up and down our country and around the world. From where I live in Clerkenwell I can witness the daily spectacle of the Shard slowly making its way up to the heavens in what will become London’s biggest phallus yet…
The epic 1,017ft Shard by Renzo Piano
I was very touched to hear David Chipperfeild’s view on architecture at the opening of his new and beautiful Turner Contemporary Gallery in Margate. The whole notion of showpiece architecture appals him. His buildings are relatively quiet, modest affairs almost vernacular in some cases…
David Chipperfield's Turner Contemporary Gallery at Margate
his Museum of Modern Literature in Marbach, Germany
and the humble River and rowing museum at Henley -on- Thames
This got me thinking about the way in which architectural whims are imposed on us mere mortals through the persuasion of ‘signature’ architects and their clients who both seem to want to immortalise their egos through epic structural legacies.
We’ve all seen these things dotted around the country especially on beaches…
Made mostly from reinforced concrete, built to survive bomb blasts, they were the bunkers, gun emplacements, observation points and radar reflectors of W11 and are still dotted around our coastline.
It was this brutal aesthetic that was to become a movement in its own right. ‘Brutalism’ was taken up by a group of architects in the 1960s and 70s who literally fell in love with exposed reinforced concrete and the rest is history in the ever present weather stained existence in all our major cities.
Here are some notable examples…
The Hayward Gallery designed by Norman Engleback, assisted by Ron Herron and Warren Chalk
The National Theatre designed by Denys Lasdun completed in 1976
Its dark underbelly
and masculine dominance
The Barbican in London designed by Chamberlin,Powell and Bon in the 70s
IBM South Bank HQ designed by Denys Lasdun
University of Leeds
Trellick Tower designed by Ernő Goldfinger. Completed in 1972 and much lauded by architects who I would think don't live there.
The Brunswick Centre design by Patrick Hodgkinson, completed in 1972
Chichester Festival Theatre designed by Philip Powell and opened in 1962
Trinity Carpark in Gateshead immortalized in the film 'Get Carter' now reduced to this...
I have long tried to appreciate these buildings but have come firmly to the belief that they have an anti people harshness. This inhumanity manifests itself in the overwhelming and intimidating size along with the unforgiving texture of exposed concrete.
The raw material
The worse example I could find in London is this building…
Samson House Southwark Street. Designed by Fitzroy Robinson & Partners in 1976
Its similarity to this is uncanny…
I find both structures incredible frightening. And having to endure these ‘in your face’ monsters day after day is an affront. But as with all things architectural one man’s meat …
A pity that there are not more David Chipperfields whose work avoids the ‘mines bigger than yours’ syndrome...
His work has grace and an understated dignity. If only architects could leave their egos in a box and think more about the effect that their work has on the people that they have to share the planet with, our environment would be much better for it.
I think I should own up to the fact that back in 1986, when my then design consultancy, Carroll, Dempsey & Thirkell had bought and old warehouse, we chose a young up and coming architect to design our new home in Bloomsbury...
And the architect we chose - why, David Chipperfield of course.
In my humble opinion, "good" architecture is like good typography: invisible. It’s for that I like David Chipperfield's projects. They have a warm and habitable atmosphere, unlike… let's say… Frank Gehry?
…“much lauded by architects who I would think don't live there”.
That’s a good point: this quote brings to my mind Le Corbusier’s Pessac housing: sometimes architects forget that, in the end, buildings are for people.
Well, these are only my musings about this excellent post.
By the way, I’m a faithful reader of your blog but I’ve never commented before… I’m just a bit shy. Anyway, pleased to meet you. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Gerhard | May 06, 2011 at 10:13 PM
Hello Gerhard - Thank you for your comment and kind words. No need to be shy on this site it is designer friendly and people in general. Always good to have feedback, as I sometimes wonder if I am striking a note with anyone out there.
Posted by: Mike Dempsey | May 07, 2011 at 08:14 AM
Thank you for the great article.
Shankar
http://www.astagramstudios.com
Posted by: Shankar K | May 10, 2011 at 01:39 AM
I wonder how much the client's ego plays in the construction of the 'mines bigger than yours' approach to architecture. Quite a bit I'm sure. Great post and excellent pictures.
Posted by: Gerry Simons | May 10, 2011 at 01:57 PM
As ever a fascinating read Mike. Although I confess that I do have an appreciation for some concrete structures, for example Tadao Ando's Church of Light in Osaka, and Truss Wall House by Ushida Findlay in Tokyo, to name but two. It's stark quality and plasticity make it quite a unique, if not at all green, architectural medium. I do agree that much of the town planning that was constructed in the 60's and 70's is of exceedingly poor architectural and structural quality. Chipperfield is an excellent architect, and you have been very fortunate to have the opportunity to work with him.
Posted by: Curator | May 10, 2011 at 07:13 PM